Open Letter on “Mors Imperator” (1887)
📖 Read the German & English side by side →
Her own furious, point-by-point answer to the jury that rejected Mors Imperator from the Berlin academic exhibition. Sent to several Berlin papers, which printed it on 5 and 6 August 1887 (among them the Kreuzzeitung and the Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung), and reprinted across Austria — here from the Grazer Volksblatt of 10 August 1887, under the sardonic headline “Byzantinismus.” It names the officials, exposes the jury's shifting grounds, and dares the public to judge. The paper added a barbed coda of its own: “Poor Holbein — with your Dance of Death you too would flop today!”
Open Letter on “Mors Imperator”
By Hermine Schmidt von Preuschen, Munich
When I sent “Mors Imperator” to Berlin, a picture that in Munich was rightly understood by all the artists and critics who saw it, and declared a serious work of art, I took the occasion to mention at the same time that its pendant, “Regina vitae,” with which “Mors Imperator” was together to set forth the biblical text “Love is strong as death” (Song of Songs 8:6), was not finished, and that I could therefore send only the one picture.
After some time a person of high rank wrote to me that she had learned, from someone officially involved with the exhibition, that “Mors Imperator,” although well painted, was to be rejected by the jury solely on account of its subject. I travelled to Berlin at once, believing I could talk the jury out of its misgivings.
The President of the Academy, Herr Professor Becker1, declared to me repeatedly and in the most definite terms, in the presence of Privy Councillor Zöllner, that the subject was the sole ground of the rejection, that such a picture could not possibly be shown to the Kaiser in his academic exhibition, and further, that the picture could only be exhibited if the Kaiser himself gave to understand that he wished it.
Under these circumstances I turned for help to His Majesty the Kaiser, who, after a photographic print of “Mors Imperator” had been laid before him, graciously had it declared, in the well-known telegram to Herr Professor Becker, that if the subject alone had been the occasion of the rejection, he took no objection to it.
Despite this pronouncement, the jury believed it must persist in rejecting the picture, and now no longer on the ground originally given to me as the only one, but supposedly on account of “unartistic treatment of an unartistic subject.” So much for the facts!
Surprising as it already was for me to hear that political motives were imputed to a picture meant to depict the transience of fame, power, and love — a thought entirely remote from me, wholly excluded by the whole conduct of my life, and whose baselessness His Majesty the Kaiser has acknowledged, for which I am grateful from the bottom of my heart — I must all the more lodge decided protest against the jury's new verdict, now dressed up in artistic motives, which is calculated to injure my artistic honour.
This is not — as I may surely say without immodesty — the work of a nameless beginner; and so the jury might well have left the judgment of my work's artistic worth to the criticism of the press and the public. I confidently throw my artistic reputation into the balance against the jury's verdict.
For a separate exhibition of “Mors Imperator,” to be held shortly, I call upon the sound judgment of the public to be the judge in my honest cause.
Berlin, August 1887. Hermine Schmidt von Preuschen (Munich).
Notes
Sources, identifications, and points where the German carries something English cannot. Added by this project; not in the original.
- ↑Professor Becker — President of the Royal Academy of Arts in Berlin — the body that staged the official annual exhibition. (the Berlin Academy of Arts)
About the book
In the summer of 1887 the jury of the Berlin academic exhibition refused Mors Imperator, her painting of Death overturning an emperor’s throne. She did not accept it quietly. She wrote an open letter and sent it to several Berlin papers, which printed it on 5 and 6 August (the Kreuzzeitung among them), and it was reprinted across Austria — the text here is from the Grazer Volksblatt of 10 August 1887, which ran it under the headline “Byzantinismus.”
It is the earliest piece of her own prose the project holds, and the first time she took her case to the public over the head of an institution — the thing she would go on doing for thirty years, and the pattern of the 1896 lecture.
The affair, in three documents
The letter answers, and is answered by, two pieces on The Paper Trail:
- The Kunst-Chronik’s report on the affair — a sober Viennese day-by-day account of the contradictory rulings.
- The Kikeriki satire — an anonymous Viennese verse attack on the jury, taking her side within days.
Her reply lives here because it is hers; the two pieces about her live there because they are not. Read together they are the whole quarrel.